Reading some more about Orlowski's poor
journalism, I came across this blog which
points out that Orlowski misquotes Larry
Lessig and builds an article around the
misquote. Then he gets busted by Lessig. : )
There are links in the blog to The Register
article and Lessig's blog, where he points
out the misquote.
http://www.guydickinson.com/sheep/archive/000718.html
I have a bunch of links criticizing
Orlowski's "journalism". Here is one where
he went after Tim O'Reilly and O'Reilly
responded at the link below. O'Reilly said:
"So one thing struck me immediately:
Orlowski didn't do any real journalism. He
got a complaint from a speaker who didn't
get included, and made that complaint the
basis for a rant. He didn't talk to anyone
at O'Reilly. He didn't make any effort to
get background or hear the other side. He
wrote a flame, not a story.
I now know that Orlowski has defined himself
as a gossip columnist, not a real
journalist. I had thought better of him. I
will take his stories with a heaping dose of
salt in future."
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/3100
This quote sums up what I have been reading
about Orlowksi pretty well:
"His articles are of varied quality - some
genuine insights conflict with some
dramatically unprofessional ranting with
little justification. His current bugbear
appears to be weblogs, which
(simplistically) he appears to be "anti".
He's also highly suspicious of Google and
has a conspiratorial mindset. His grammar
and spelling leave much to be desired and he
has a tendency not to fact-check and to
actively mischaracterise other people's
opinions in order to support his position."
http://www.infoanarchy.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Andrew_Orlowski
I read about his criticism of google and it
seems that many of his facts were wrong.
Then he uses these incorrect facts to make
his argument.