Posted by Jon Newton in on September 15, 2003 at 12:56 PM
|
|
![]()
High-Tech Heroin
By Richard Forno
Dostoevsky once wrote that "in the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, 'Make us your slaves, but feed us.'" His prophecy is relevant when examining the modern Information Age - a dark, corporate-controlled society predicted by such artistic legends as Bruce Sterling, George Lucas, Ridley Scott, and William Gibson – and is the focus of this article.
We want to be part of this information environment and feel more empowered with each new gadget, service, or digital connection in our lives. The concept of "information everywhere" provides instant gratification to satisfy our needs for books, music, porn, and digital interaction with others through web searches, e-commerce, wireless, instant messaging, e-mail, and streaming content over broadband. High-speed links enable organizations to operate around the world at light speed and conduct business on a twenty-four hour clock. The sun never sets in the Information Age; we are always plugged into the global matrix of the information domain. We're addicted to it and constantly awash in a sea of electronic stimuli.
Yet as we rush to embrace the latest and greatest gadgetry or high-tech service and satisfy our techno-craving, we become further dependent on these products and their manufacturers – so dependent that when something breaks, crashes, or is attacked, our ability to function is reduced or eliminated. Given the frequent problems associated with the Information Age - losing internet connections, breaking personal digital assistants, malicious software incidents, or suffering any number of recurring problems with software or hardware products, we should take a minute to consider whether we're really more or less independent - or empowered - today than we think, knowing that how we act during such stressful periods is similar to a heroin junkie's actions during withdrawal.
Technology, like gambling and heroin, is addictive. We're driven or forced into buying new gadgets and constantly upgrading our technology for any number of reasons, both real and perceived, and feel uncomfortable without our latest "fix." Corporations love this because once we accept and begin using their products or services, the dependency is formed and they essentially own our information – and subsequently, society and us. Their proprietary lock on our collective information means they can force us to spend money and upgrade on their schedule and not when we truly need - or can afford - to do so, regardless of whether or not we need the latest features, and regardless of the consequences that may haunt us down the road.
But unlike many other industries from the Industrial Age and the heroin dealers, high-tech corporations are in a unique position to determine - and force - us addicts to spend money while relinquishing our rights to seek recourse for damages arising from their faulty products no matter what pain we must endure during our period of indentured servitude and addiction to their problematic technologies. In some cases, particularly in mainstream operating systems, software, and internet-based services, it's one step short of blackmail. We all certainly can't go cold turkey very easily, although some may try and succeed.
To make things worse, government practically has outsourced the oversight and definition of technology-based expression and community interaction to for-profit corporations and secretive industry-specific cartels (e.g., the MPAA, RIAA, SIA, BSA, ICANN) who have wasted no time in rewriting the rules for how they want our information-based society to operate according to their interests, not ours. At times, you might even say we've voluntarily imprisoned ourselves under the control of profit-seeking wardens who have little if any real oversight or accountability for their actions. Our high-tech heroin dealers are not only promoting and profiting from their product but developing the laws and methods to govern and regulate its use while protecting themselves from any negative side-effects and ensuring their revenue stream.
Whether it is our ability to share available creative products according to existing laws, bring to market new creative works, establish an identity in cyberspace, or otherwise exchange digital information, these groups - with well-funded (read: purchased) government approval - have declared themselves the overlords of their industry-specific fiefdoms that comprise the Information Age. Each industry and vendor wants to assert their proprietary technical and legal authority over who does what, when, how, and under what conditions with their products and services, even if their profiteering desires are incompatible with our law-abiding ones. And if their efforts to maintain law and order according to their proprietary technical standards or legal trickery fail, they can always turn things over to the federal government for action as a backup plan.
Combining these perverts of profit with the fickle, often-ignorant nature of our elected lawmakers has produced an Information Age where the rights and abilities of the individual don't matter. Neither does facilitating society's evolution by allowing it to take maximum advantage of technology's capabilities for its collective benefit. Or reality. Today, what matters is only how much money and freedom people are willing (or forced) to pay (or sacrifice) to their corporate masters for the privilege of living within the various information-based fiefdoms provided for them to generate revenue.
The Information Age will not be remembered by the fun, high-flying and overwhelmingly feel-good Dot Com days despite the ongoing presence of Dot Com-developed technologies. Rather, the Information Age will be remembered as a period when 12-year old girls from New York slums, senior citizens, and innovative college students are harrassed by greedy cartels seeking to scare their future customers into submission; when the profit goals of high-tech vendors determine how client businesses and people are organized and interact; when everyone is presumed a potential criminal until proven otherwise according to oppressive industry-defined criteria; when a once-awesome revolution in global communications became converted into a cesspool of unsolicited and offensive marketing messages; when knowing how to do something that's illegal is just as illegal as actually doing something that's illegal; when the legal protections over freedom of speech are trumped to preserve corporate secrets or marketshare while hiding vulnerabilities that endanger the public; when our lives are monitored and dissected by marketing firms looking for the best way to sell us things we don't need or want; and when technology's promise and alluring capabilities are used to surreptitiously entrap and willingly imprison members of the information-age society instead of truly empowering them.
Dostoevsky was way ahead of his time.
# # # #
(c) 2003 by Author. All Rights Reserved.
Permission granted to redistribute this article in its entirety with credit to author.
Richard Forno is a security technologist and author of "Weapons of Mass Delusion: America's Real National Emergency." His home in cyberspace is at http://www.infowarrior.org/.
|
|
User Comments
CodeWarrior
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 1:04 PM
This was a fine piece, and articulated something I have also observed for a while. When we do things that are pleasing to us, we often get a beta-endorphin high. The endorphins are morphine like endogenous chemicals, and literally, give you a high. Downloading is an activity that results in people getting what they want and thus, becomes associated with pleasure giving chemicals and need reduction. People who are "addictive personalities" can get just as addicted to computers/cell phone usage/ etc., as they can get addicted to food, sex, or booze (and other drugs). LOL..but the image of anyone "jonesing" for a "50 cent" song
is enough to provoke and LOL/ROFL/LMAO.
But, the topic is quite serious, and I totally agree with Mr. Forno.
~code
|
bmanhero
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 1:07 PM
Beautiful article; brilliantly written, and completely accurate. I am purchasing your book, Richard!
|
iostreamh
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 1:20 PM
Amen. Outstanding article.
|
f-the-riaa
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 1:31 PM
Richard would have had a much harder time publishing his message 20 years ago, prior to the technological herion we now have. As for me, I have the equipment, knowledge and willingness to communicate worldwide the way we did many years ago, via radiotelegraph. The dots and dits of Morse Code!
WI-FI (802.11b)is a great way to set up file sharing hotspots, totally out of the eye of big brother and the RIAA. WI-FI's range and coverage can easily be controlled by antenna selection and setup.
.-.. --- .-..
..-. ..- -.-. -.- - .... . .-. .. .- .-
|
spracky
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 1:46 PM
Excellent and True
|
MerylStryfe
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 2:08 PM
Tremendous article.
|
captdunsel
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 2:15 PM
god I'm scared. and I'm not joking. how long before they start branding people on the palm and the forehead? and the more I think about it the more I think I need to spend my money on other things than a computer. I've already quit buying music and going to he movies.
|
indieWarriors
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 2:24 PM
*APPLAUSE* *WHISTLE*
Encore! Encore!
I couldnt have written that piece any better. I wish he could state that on public television.
|
Anti-RIAA
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 3:05 PM
Sad but true. A slowly progressing New World Order. Things aren't as bleak as they may seem though. People will fight when it comes down to it.
|
seraphielx
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 3:44 PM
can we boycott gateway as well....or at least there tech support?
|
f-the-riaa
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 3:44 PM
What is powering your PC?, or lights?
or heat? How do you get around...a car powered by big oil?...bus, at the mercy of the transit authority? Food??
Freedom isn't free. If the lights go out again as they have recently from NYC to Detroit, what will YOU do? Shiver in the dark, or bask in the warmth and light of YOUR independantly generated light and heat. Even if the internet goes down, there's packet radio. Don't freeze in the dark. Now, back to the downloading on my solar and wind powered machine while I munch on organical grown food from the victory garden. Freeing ourselves from the reins of BIG music is a great start and is even better practice for when we free ourselves from BIG energy and BIG food.
check out www.the-mrea.org
lol
|
greatscottpr...
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 3:49 PM
"His Truth Is Marching On"!!!!!!
AND SO ARE "WE"!!!
What incredible thoughts! I thank God for all of you here educating... and yes even for all this insane technology, Without it, I can't imagine the lies we would be believing... And I say MORE, MORE POWER TO THE PEOPLE!
GO 
-..... -.-...--.... .--...-...-.. ....- -.-----..- ..-..-...

Richard Forno you are a genius and I thank you for sharing!
|
indieWarriors
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 4:11 PM
Thank God for open source developers and hardware engineers.
Support us!
|
TheSherminator
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 4:16 PM
Brilliant. Sad but true. Everything that's wrong with technology summed up in that article. Spam and junkmail ought to be 100% illegal.
I have a horrible fear.
I am entering into the field of GIS (for those of you who are familiar), and hope I never have to choose between my own financial well-being and organizing a massive spam & junk mail campaign. ugh.
|
JoshPrince
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 4:17 PM
Excellent article. Also loved the Dostoyevsky quote- he's one of my favorite authors.
|
gdZiemann
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 4:35 PM
captdunsel -- First they pass out t-shirts.... Metallica, Elton John, Madonna...
|
goingnova
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 5:00 PM
I read this article on another web site a lot earlier this morning, very good article in my opinion. The author also has written some other really good articles. I'm sure if you googled his name, you'd find more. Man, I feel like we're in for a long fight, not just against the RIAA, but a lot of other industrial giants.
~goingnova
|
Jazzmary2U
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 5:39 PM
Kudos, Jon.. for again bringing excellent writing to this site. 
|
paulruss
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 5:45 PM
Wow. I have nothing to add. Just, wow.
|
HolywarRIAA
|
Date: September 15, 2003 @ 9:24 PM
"Neither does facilitating society's evolution by allowing it to take maximum advantage of technology's capabilities for its collective benefit."
'Nuff said.
|
PhantomGhost
|
Date: September 16, 2003 @ 12:52 AM
I have to say- a very interesting article indeed.
|
HanSolo00
|
Date: September 16, 2003 @ 3:47 AM
TheSherminator: "I have a horrible fear.
I am entering into the field of GIS (for those of you who are familiar), and hope I never have to choose between my own financial well-being and organizing a massive spam & junk mail campaign. ugh."
Good profession... I've been involved with GIS for about 15 years and worked for myself for the last 5--I can't emphasize enough the joy and freedom working for yourself gives (plus I love my work.) If you have a bad boss (client) you simply don't ever work for them again. Plus, working for yourself gives you complete flexibility with your schedule.
Wow, he definately hit all the nails on their heads in that article. I've asking some of my friends for a long time why they insist on living their lives by what corporations are telling them how to live and trying to keep them running breathless on the junk-we-don't-need/toys/gadgets/supply/demand/credit/debt/job hamster wheel. I got off of it a while ago and boy does it ever feel good.
|
purfus
|
Date: September 16, 2003 @ 8:31 AM
So true, so true..... What can we do. The needle in my vain itches to be filled. While the logic in my mind says "This is what I was born for?" This is truely a sad age in our history and if we live through it we will be lucky. Truely the next age must be enlightenment. For that is what follows any great addiction, for the survivors.
|
IWANTMYMP3
|
Date: September 16, 2003 @ 11:37 AM
good article and seraphielx you would have to stand in line for your gateway boycott...hewlit packard makes them look like Mensa members
|
You must be logged in to post replies to news articles.
Log in or register with the form at the top of the page.
|
|
|
|