Source: EFF

May 19th, 2008
Microsoft's Masters: Whose Rules Does Your Media Center Play By?
Posted by Danny O'Brien

While its customers are still puzzling over why Vista Media Center is suddenly refusing to record over-the-air NBC digital TV, Microsoft has come out with an astounding admission, courtesy of Greg Sandoval at CNet News:

"Microsoft included technologies in Windows based on rules set forth by the (Federal Communications Commission)," a Microsoft spokeswoman wrote in an e-mail to CNET News.com. "As part of these regulations, Windows Media Center fully adheres to the flags used by broadcasters and content owners to determine how their content is distributed and consumed."

Microsoft's statement shines light on how Microsoft expects Media Center to behave. If this is the company's explanation for what users are seeing when attempting to record digital NBC broadcasts over-the-air, then Microsoft is saying Vista obeys the broadcast flag: a requirement rejected by courts and Congress.

The FCC regulation that Microsoft's spokesperson says it follows is not in force - that is, there is no legal requirement for them to follow these rules. They were rejected by the D.C. Circuit of Appeals in a case brought forward by librarians, public interest and consumer groups (including EFF and Public Knowledge). Microsoft is not complying with the FCC: it is complying with the "broadcasters and content owners" who so dearly wanted the flag in place, and failed to manage it.

Even if Microsoft somehow believes the FCC regulations still apply, they are going far beyond mere compliance. Here's the FCC's rulemaking on the flag:

In light of our decision to adopt a redistribution control scheme and to avoid any confusion, we wish to reemphasize that our action herein in no way limits or prevents consumers from making copies of digital broadcast television content.

...

[The aim of the broadcast flag] will not ... interfere with or preclude consumers from copying broadcast programming and using or redistributing it within the home or similar personal environment as consistent with copyright law.

Here is Microsoft's interpretation of an over-the-air flag:

Note how Vista forbids recording this broadcast program at all: exactly what the FCC said the flag should not do. (The broadcast flag requirements allowed you to record TV, but required the recorded material be "protected" to prevent you from redistributing it beyond approved and locked-down devices). In Microsoft's attempt to "fully adhere', they have gone beyond what the FCC ever asked them to do: they have agreed to what broadcast and content owners could only dream of passing by fiat.

Microsoft's attempt to cover its behavior by claiming compliance with the FCC neither explains nor justifies the errors that their customers are currently seeing. The company needs to spell out exactly whose rules Vista is following, and exactly how they affect their customers computers' current and future behavior.

another reason to buy a mac next time I have the funds to get a new computer!

My computer doesn't know what DRM is and I don't want one that does.

Microsoft has ALWAYS added Big Brother features to their software. I remember years ago when they were asking permission from someone or other to have their operating system check all of your software and report back to Microsoft.

It was already built in, they were just asking permission. Without any grasp of the programming within, I have always thought that the reason that Windows is so prone to viruses, spyware, etc. is because Microsoft left those things open on purpose.

Either that or they're just incompetent.

When I chose to go Apple, it was because I worked in a newspaper environment and that's the direction they chose for pragmatic reasons.

I stayed with Apple because they weren't Microsoft. I suppose the mind-set is comparable to my opinion of the RIAA and independent music. In both circumstances, as I encountered them, there's one side that wants to make piles of money and controls 85% of the industry, while the other side just wants to make cool stuff, on the theory that other people will agree that it's cool and maybe buy it.

While I'm happy with my Mac, it's still for pragmatic reasons involved with the creative things I use a computer for, which is greatly simplified by no longer having to be compatible with the business world.

Your mileage may vary. There are other options now. I haven't even looked at them. It's not an "either/or" choice anymore.

"My computer doesn't know what DRM is and I don't want one that does."

Mine does, however, it knows that I do not approve, and will happily remove it from files as I request. *grin*.

It makes no effort to place drm on any of my files, but it will on command make every possible effort to remove known drm technology from a file and/or files provided/downloaded.

Anyways, to each his own right?