![]()
We all know just how bad the RIAA and MPAA have become, but just when you thought no one could do any worse -- you get to read an article like this one. Video Professor is best known for touting "free" computer training CDs via infomercials and has received some rather negative reviews on infomercialscams.com. Once the nutty professor got wind of this, the shit hit the fan as per this page:
http://www.infomercialscams.com/video_professor.htm
Most of the reviews appearing on infomercialratings.com and infomercialscams.com are negative. On July 20, 2007, they received several letters from the president of Video Professor, Bettye Harrison. On September 6, 2007, infomercialratings.com's Nevada office was served with a court ordered subpoena and two checks for $40.81 each. The checks are supposed to cover expenses for time and resources. Video Professor attorney Gregory C. Smith, Esq. is the name listed on the subpoena. A judge has given permission for the subpoena to be served. The subpoena demands all consumer comments about Video Professor, including any identifying information (IP addresses, physical addresses, names, emails, phone, etc.)
Video professor claims that certain customers have violated trademark and defamation laws by criticizing their services.
A direct quote from the Video Professor website reads, "Any company can say good things about its own product, but the real proof of product quality is when customers speak out about its excellence." Ironically, Video Professor is suing its own customers, despite the aforementioned quote.
More information about this story -- including pdf copies of the various letters and legal documentation can be seen on the before mentioned url. This is an amazing violation of First Amendment Rights above and beyond what the RIAA and MPAA have even ever dared to do.
In fact -- if all accounts on infomercialratings.com and infomercialscams.com are 100% accurate -- they can be sued for making that url available. I can be sued for submitting this article and voicing my opinions on the situation. Shmoo can be sued because he's an Article Admin on Boycott RIAA. Tracy and Leflaw can be sued because they own Boycott RIAA. Anyone who replies to this article with a comment that is unfavorable towards video professor can be sued for it.
Hiel fuckin' Hitler! What is our judicial system coming to these days?! This is truly ridiculous when inalienable human rights can be so easily violated.
In related news: Another source has mentioned that these legal attacks have been ceased as per this url:
http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/release.cfm?ID=2573
Dec. 18, 2007
‘Video Professor’ Backs Off Attempt to Unmask Internet Critics
First Amendment Protects Web Site Operator Represented by Public Citizen
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Video Professor, a Colorado firm that uses infomercials to hawk computer-training lessons, has dropped its fight to identify customers who criticized the company on two consumer Web sites, according to a motion filed in federal court.
Video Professor dropped its subpoena against InfomercialScams.com after Public Citizen objected in a letter to the company’s attorney. Among several shortcomings, the Video Professor’s suit did not meet the legal threshold necessary to force the Web site to identify anonymous critics, Public Citizen attorney Paul Alan Levy wrote in September.
The company also withdrew a similar subpoena against RipoffReport.com, which is not represented by Public Citizen. The withdrawals were part of a motion filed Monday in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. Levy hailed the company’s decision as a win, not only for Leonard Fitness, which operates the InfomercialScams.com Web site, but as a victory for free speech on the Internet.
“When you confront bullies, they often don’t have the stomach to take on fights they’re clearly not going to win.” Levy said. “The First Amendment is a powerful weapon when used against companies that would try to use the courts to muzzle their critics.”
The Video Professor offers CDs and online lessons on a wide range of computer programs and skills. Company founder John Scherer claims that 8 million people have purchased his products since he started selling instructional videos 20 years ago.
Interestingly, Scherer’s own Web site warns consumers to check out companies they don’t know by using Internet search engines to find customer reviews.
Along with withdrawing its subpoena against InfomercialScams.com, Video Professor earlier dropped a similar subpoena against InfomercialRatings.com, another Leonard Fitness site.
Although Video Professor has dropped some subpoenas in the case, it continues to seek the identities of people who it claims defamed the company on the Wikipedia Web site. Wikipedia apparently provided Video Professor with the IP addresses of people who posted on its site. It is not clear whether Wikipedia gave any notice to the people whose information was released.
The Video Professor has subpoenaed Comcast Cable for information that would reveal one of the Wikipedia posters.
Although Public Citizen does not represent Wikipedia or Comcast, Levy said the same arguments he used in defending Leonard Fitness apply.
State and federal courts throughout the country recognize the right to speak anonymously on the Internet, said Levy, who runs the Internet Free Speech program at Public Citizen. To identify anonymous critics, the Video Professor would have to show a likelihood of success on the merits of the case, which it has not, he said.
Pretty crazy stuff, eh? More about it can be read on all of the various before mentioned urls. I'll give the RIAA and MPAA this much though: at least (as far as I know) they've yet to go after someone for the sole crime of publicly voicing a negative opinion about them.