![]()
What we've learned in this decade is the major labels are becoming ever
more irrelevant. Not only do they not create what so many are
listening to, they've lost their power to dictate the future, progress in the
marketplace has been wrested from them.
DRM is a red herring. As is sale by track. Most people with hand-held
music players are listening to vast quantities of music sans copy
protection. The fact that it's taken this long for the major labels to
come to grips with this reality is evidence of their sideshow nature.
They just don't get it, and seemingly never will.
Now that the DRM war is finally over, the labels have got to fight the
value war. Yes, people today think music has no value, they need to be
sued into submission, they need to be taught that CDs are worth every
dollar of their inflated price, that digital tracks should cost the
aliquot share price of a CD. This is utterly hysterical, because it too
goes against reality.
People own a lot of tracks. It's not relevant whether they actually
listen to them, they want to own them. And they're easily acquired. Not
only via Net P2P, but hard drive swapping, CD ripping...techniques
that cannot be quashed. Where is the major labels' answer to this?
Nonexistent.
The future is already here. The old CD paradigm, the old scarcity
construct, is gone. If people want to hear music, they're not forced to
sit by their stereos, listening to the radio for an aural glimpse, they
just go online and take what they want. This behavior must be
monetized, but the labels won't even make a reasonable streaming deal. Their
numbers are so heinous that iMeem can't make money. Is this a way to
guarantee your future?
I'm not sure the major labels have much of a future. They've
squandered it. And although they've got deep pockets compared to indie
musicians, they've got no one working at their labels anymore, they don't have
the manpower to dominate in the coming years. Winners will develop and
market acts. Whether they be by 360 or conventional deals. Where is
the major label infrastructure that's going to get people to sign with
them?
It's not like the TV and radio airplay majors may deliver has the
impact it used to. It's almost impossible to gain a large share of the
public's attention. Never mind get them to pay for music.
You could say the system is broken, I'd say it broke a long time ago
and we're now in the healing process. It looks like chaos from afar,
kind of like a forest after a fire. But fires are necessary, to
reinvigorate the land, seedlings develop, which grow into new trees. We're in
this phase now.
You can't see the acts of the future. And you can't see those who are
building them. And when they grow, there might not be a hundred
dominant trees, but thousands. A veritable forest of acts. This is a game
the majors are not prepared for. In order to dominate the new music
sphere majors must sign and develop a PLETHORA of acts at a very cheap
price, making pennies at a time. This, of course, does not support the
incredible overhead of today's companies. Where the worker bees have
been laid off and those left are making a fortune. You need a zillion
worker bees and chiefs with only upside. But those in power at the majors
don't want to give up their salaries, their old Tommy Mottola
lifestyles. But did you notice that Tommy Mottola has never come back?
This is not complicated. It's about facing reality and monetizing it.
Selling buckets of tracks cheaply and trying to hook people on
credible acts, not evanescent crap. Lower the price and sell more. And
rental ain't in the immediate future, this dropping of DRM proves it.
People want freedom, if you're putting on locks, you're driving people
away.
Sale by track is economic death. Whether they be wrapped in DRM or
not. You can't have everybody making a 99 cent decision. You've got to
get ten bucks from everyone. Just like the cable systems won't sell
their channels a la carte. The science is not new, it's just that those
in the record business have been so busying bullying and paying people
off that they've neglected to study economics in general.
Mobile phones blew up when the price came down. Everyone over the age
of twelve has now got a device. Everybody should own music. The way
this happens is to forge reasonable plans, which are cheap,
incentivizing people to partake. Ripping off the DRM is a nice start, but it's a
small part of the equation. Allow people to hear whatever they want
when they want. Instead of putting up walls, send out invitations. Get
in bed with the customer. You can't sell music to people who are not
friends. The war must end, music must be monetized. So far the majors
have only succeeded in making music free. Their efforts are needed in
order to get everyone to pay. But this requires a reasonable business
proposition. But as seen in the last eight years, this business
proposition is not needed for music to survive, just the major labels.
Music's doing just fine, healthier than ever. People are writing and playing
and the audience is listening. Meanwhile, the majors are cutting
staff and reporting horrific numbers. This disconnect won't go on forever.
At some point, the business will be run by people who understand the
new world. Based on how long it's taken three of the four majors to
realize DRM is not the answer, I doubt these companies will be in charge
of the game in the future.
--
Visit the archive:
http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/