Username: Password: lost p/w?
home | help | subscribe | search | register
"File-Sharing Is, Like, Totally Uncool"
Posted by AdvancedAlexander Wehr in on August 7, 2004 at 3:42 AM



http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.05/mpaa.html

The MPAA tries to turn junior high school into antipiracy boot camp.

By Jeff Howe
Page 1 of 1

The producer tells her sad story with her fists curled inside the sleeves of an oversize hooded sweatshirt: "I'm, like, losing my job, and maybe I, like, need that money for my family or something." The cause of her consternation: peer-to-peer file-sharing, which she says is devastating Hollywood.

The "producer" doesn't produce movies any more than the "actor" or "singer" sitting beside her acts or sings. They are all seventh-graders at Sierra Vista Junior High in Southern California's Santa Clarita Valley. They're engaged in a role-playing game, as directed in a lesson plan sponsored and bankrolled by the Motion Picture Association of America. The curriculum - called "What's the Diff?: A Guide to Digital Citizenship" - has reached slightly more than half a million junior high students since it began this school year.


The class is led by Jean Sutton, a volunteer from Junior Achievement, a nonprofit business education group. She hands each student a card that explains what role they are to play - actor, director, producer, singer, computer user, or set builder - and what their viewpoint is supposed to be. "It's good you have your own opinions," Sutton tells them. "But I want you to do the activity based on what the little piece of paper says."


Five of the pieces assert that file-sharing is unequivocally immoral. "Illegal file-swapping has turned my dreams into nightmares," reads the singer's card. "When people illegally download, they are stealing from my family and me," reads the set builder's. The single counterpoint is represented by the computer user. He defends file-sharing largely on the grounds that he won't get caught: "Last time I checked, the Internet police didn't exist."


The activity seems less a role-playing exercise than a regurgitation. Sutton asks each student "why file-swapping's such a big deal." The kids gamely paraphrase from their squares of paper. "The directors don't get paid when the people download movies," says a director. "If only, like, one person is buying the movie and everyone else is copying it, the people in the movies can't, like, make the set things," says a set builder. "It's costing me, like, big bucks because people, like, download them instead of buying them," says a producer. The children, most from the middle-class suburb of Santa Clarita, participate enthusiastically and don't appear troubled, or even bored, by the rote nature of the exercise.


"What's the Diff?" got its start when the MPAA, the trade group representing Hollywood studios, approached Junior Achievement with $100,000 and a notion to get its ideas about the ethics of file-sharing into the classroom. It was written by JA staffers and consultants in close communication with Craig Hoffman, the director of corporate communications at Warner Bros. Entertainment.


The point of the program, says MPAA spokesperson Rich Taylor, is for "students to reach their own conclusions about being a good digital citizen." The real point, of course, is to protect Hollywood from the fate of the record industry. While the music business has already suffered from file-sharing, the film industry has so far been largely unaffected. In fact, according to an Adams Media Research report, Hollywood has seen revenue rise 27 percent in the same four-year period that the recording industry went into free fall. So consider this a preemptive attack, a giant guilt trip on the file-sharing public. Compared to the recording industry's strategy to sue everyone in sight, "What's the Diff?" seems downright enlightened.


Critics aren't mollified. The program presents a "tremendously one-sided view of copyright," says Wendy Seltzer, a lawyer for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "There's no balance; it's entirely corporate driven. If anything, it's an exercise in how efficiently you can brainwash students."


Seltzer might be considerably less concerned had she sat in on a recent lesson at Commerce Middle School in a working-class neighborhood of Yonkers, New York. As in Santa Clarita, the kids here read their stock responses, but unlike their Californian counterparts, they do it in a sullen monotone, as if reciting some musty poem. Only the computer user, an animated wiseass in baggy jeans, delivers a passionate response. "It's not hurting anybody. I'm not selling it. I'm using it in my home." The other kids nod energetically at this, and hands shoot up throughout the room. One boy says, "If the computer user is just downloading music, how are the carpenters who work on movie sets being hurt?" The other students regard this as irrefutable logic, and a chorus of "mm-hmm" and "that's right" fills the room.


A confident, articulate girl in cornrows and too-tight jeans speaks up. "Look, you preview what's on the CD, and if you like it, you go out and buy the CD because you get a booklet and, like, extra stuff with it." This, whether she knows it or not, is exactly the argument that the major music labels are hearing from many of their own consultants.


As the class winds down, several kids say that downloading files from Kazaa is no different than borrowing a library book. "After you get it, you're just going to delete it anyway," a boy says. JA volunteer Evan Snyder, who's good with the kids, gets a crafty look on his face. "How is that different from me just borrowing a Ferrari from the dealership and just passing it around to my friends?"


The girl in the cornrows snaps back, "Well, that's fine! You're borrowing it! As long as you give it back." The bell rings, and the students bustle into the well-worn hallways of their middle school.


User Comments

Advancedmroop
Date: August 7, 2004 @ 3:18 PM
This article was already posted here when it was published in May.

"A detail on "what's the diff", i suppose the diff is in the fact that kids are a little less pliant than i expected to the rhetoric being shoved at them."

"Pliant" is the wrong word. The word you are looking for is "susceptible". Your constant incorrect usage of big words is hilarious. I am still laughing about "Merovingian". : )
Advancedraoulduke1
Date: August 7, 2004 @ 3:33 PM
"Pliant" is the wrong word"

You are a jackass! Check out what my thesaurus says about "pliant":

Pliant - adj. “An impressionable age”; “the plastic minds of children”’ “A pliant nature”; Plastic; susceptible.
Advancedraoulduke1
Date: August 7, 2004 @ 3:35 PM
Now I'm sorry I came right out and said that, but, come on, you have to admit you threw that one away.
Advancedmroop
Date: August 7, 2004 @ 4:03 PM
I agree with you on the meaning of pliant, but the usage is incorrect: "pliant ... to the rhetoric" is wrong, "susceptible ... to the rhetoric" is right.
Advancedraoulduke1
Date: August 7, 2004 @ 5:14 PM
Hell, you maybe right, I can't think that hard.
Advancedcompmore
Date: August 7, 2004 @ 6:37 PM
Critics aren't mollified. The program presents a "tremendously one-sided view of copyright," says Wendy Seltzer, a lawyer for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "There's no balance; it's entirely corporate driven. If anything, it's an exercise in how efficiently you can brainwash students."

Here's a lawyer I can respect
IntermediateBufo
Date: August 7, 2004 @ 7:40 PM

I totally agree with you compmore.

I'm not against teaching kids about copyright law, but if you do then you need to teach about the problems with the law as well as the benefits that copyright law is trying to achieve (for example, I'll bet this 'cute' little skit that these kids are having to play doesn't include anyone bemoaning that fact that they will probably have to live for over a century before any of the songs they are listening to now enter the public domain (and even that is a stretch, since it is quite likely that the copyright life terms will be extended even more by Congress in the near future).

Next, why don't we have these kids do a skit on how wrong it is to cheat on their Federal Income Tax?
Chief Op OfficerShadowMom
Date: August 7, 2004 @ 9:00 PM
Social Studies today is not what it used to be--bicycle safety and other such important stuff is what they spent an entire unit on in gifted 7th grade social studies at my daughter's school this year. Neat, huh? Just in case--maybe George missed that class when he went to school.
Otherindependentm...
Date: August 7, 2004 @ 10:52 PM
"They're engaged in a role-playing game, as directed in a lesson plan sponsored and bankrolled by the Motion Picture Association of America."

Oh my God, I am gonna be sick. Can we not pass a law or something to keep them out of our kids classrooms? We don't allow religious organizations nor political groups to influence our youth in the public schools, so why allow these greedy corporations?

Who the fuck is in charge of this country?
(Need I even ask?)

Shmoo
Alternativernowmusic
Date: August 8, 2004 @ 4:28 AM
This is an excellent example of the psycological warware being waged not only on these grade school kids but on our entire society, by corporate America. Not that I despise corporate America--it's the backbone of our economy, but their practices are motivated by the love of money.

But "THE WILD WEST OF PROGRESS", our internet, is here now.

Let us explore and conquer it's digital waves for the freedom of expression.

And fight to keep the money loving wolves at bay.

rnowmusic
IntermediateNiceGuy2003
Date: August 8, 2004 @ 2:42 PM
Well of course the Californian kids are going to be easily brainwashed by this. They're worried about the money being lost as movie studios abandon the Golden State for cheaper locations in Vancouver, North Carolina, or even Romania.

Lower classes are generally less susceptible to brainwashing off this type. They don't believe what they're told because they've generally been lied to most of their life. Upper classes, those with the money to buy whatever they want, will believe anything they're told.
Intermediatewet1
Date: August 8, 2004 @ 4:06 PM
For some industry so destitute in funds from the ravages of p2p, they sure got a lotta money to throw around.

They have managed to buy the respectability to gain entrance into the learning halls of the children.

After seeing the stunts they pulled with what they sent as a settlement result, do you really want these yoyo's saying anything to your kids?

You can bet this is presented as one sided as it gets. Only the view of a good consumer should be will be presented. Nothing about what is legal and not legal, regarding copywrite law will be presented unless it is to put the majors in good light.

This is not "getting an education" in the proper sense of the word.

I would imagine most kids already know the score to some degree. They will agree in class but I doubt that agreement will adhere to any of them that really know what is going on.


Advancedmtekk
Date: August 8, 2004 @ 5:32 PM
"File-Sharing Is, Like, Totally Uncool"
please no californian chick speak, here in MN that isn't tollerated. the improper use of the word 'like' really buggs the hell out of my and allot of people i know.

Don't be a fool, Don't pay attention to the MPAA/RIAA in school.
AdvancedTheSherminator
Date: August 8, 2004 @ 8:37 PM
Staying in school is becomming worse and worse of an idea. Big Corporations should not be "teaching" (brainwashing) kids while they are in school into staying loyal to their products for life. That's sick.
DMembercodeworrier
Date: August 9, 2004 @ 11:33 PM
You gotta disagree with compmore. A lawyer from the electronic frontier is the best way to ensure that the debate stays one side.

Who funds them?

Who appointed them gaurdians of cyberspace etc?

On waht basis are they held up as the answer to any perceived bias, surely its up to the education authorities to make sure that the information is balanced...or is that another conspiracy...
You must be logged in to post replies to news articles.
Log in or register with the form at the top of the page.

 

 

 

search

news tree


advertising



 

 
© DMusic LLC - Advertising | Employment | TOS | Subscribe