Username: Password: lost p/w?
home | help | subscribe | search | register
Hitler Heir Doesn't Want 'Mein Kampf' Royalties
Posted by Advancedpepe512000 in on May 25, 2004 at 5:26 AM



Offbeat News
Monday, May 24, 2004


BERLIN (Reuters) - A German historian said Sunday a distant relative of Adolf Hitler could sue the state of Bavaria for royalties from the Nazi dictator's book "Mein Kampf" but the retired Austrian engineer said he wants no part of it.

Werner Maser told Bild am Sonntag that Peter Raubal, whose father Leo Raubal was a nephew of Hitler, would have a strong chance of winning the copyright from Bavaria, which was given the German rights to the book by the postwar occupying powers.

"Peter Raubal is the only heir of Hitler that I know of," Maser said. "As the closest relative alive, he could claim royalties from Hitler's book 'Mein Kampf'. Raubal would have to sue Bavaria. I am quite certain he would win."

Hitler died with no immediate heirs but Leo Raubal was one of his half-sister Angela Raubal's children. Maser said Leo Raubal long considered such a lawsuit before his death in 1979. Bild am Sonntag said royalties could be worth millions of euros.

"Yes I know the whole story about Hitler's inheritance," Peter Raubal told Bild am Sonntag in what the paper said were his first public comments on the issue. "But I don't want to have anything to do with it. I will not do anything about it. I only want to be left alone."

In Germany, it is illegal to distribute "Mein Kampf" except in limited circumstances. Nazi symbols like the swastika and the stiff-armed Hitler salute are also banned. "Mein Kampf" is available online and in most countries, including Israel.

Hitler dictated the tome to his secretary Rudolf Hess while in prison in Bavaria following the failed Munich "Beer Hall" putsch of 1923. It outlines a doctrine of German racial supremacy and ambitions to annex vast areas of the Soviet Union.

Published in 1925, it became a school textbook after Hitler won power in 1933. All German newlyweds also received a copy.

Now, purchasers who can prove an academic purpose may secure an existing copy but otherwise sales are banned and Bavaria refused to authorize new copies. The Allied Control Commission assigned Bavaria the rights to Hitler's assets in 1946.


Story here

http://my.netscape.com/corewidgets/news/story.psp?cat=50900&id=2004052409500002581830







User Comments

Bluegrassleflaw
Date: May 24, 2004 @ 6:13 PM
Finally, someone with some class. (Am I allowed to report this , since it mentions Nazis?)
AdminCodeWarrior
Date: May 25, 2004 @ 9:57 AM
:) (Smile)
IntermediateNiceGuy2003
Date: May 25, 2004 @ 11:36 AM
Now why did the Allied Control Commission go and do a dumb thing like that. They should have taken Hitler's assets and distributed them to all the families of all the countries he brutally occupied. "Mein Kampf" has no rights, as far as I see. It is public domain.

Of course you can buy a copy at your local Barnes & Noble.
AdminCodeWarrior
Date: May 25, 2004 @ 12:49 PM
A lot of the Nazi gold ended up in the capital of the New World Order...Geneva Switzerland!
DMemberJByron
Date: May 25, 2004 @ 1:02 PM
If he does have a claim to it under German law, he should make his claim to it, then publically dedicate it to the public domain so nobody can profit from it, and it would be unrestricted for historians and academics. My view.
Advancedcaptdunsel
Date: May 25, 2004 @ 4:57 PM
He's probably doing the best possible thing. Can't say as I blame him for wanting no part of the whole mess.
DMemberMax-Stone
Date: May 25, 2004 @ 5:35 PM
"A lot of the Nazi gold ended up in the capital of the New World Order...Geneva Switzerland!"

I like your subtle comments about the NWO. lol (no sarcasm here)
Advancedraoulduke1
Date: May 25, 2004 @ 5:54 PM
What the hell, he should sue for 'em.
DMemberzippythechip...
Date: May 25, 2004 @ 9:33 PM
"The Allied Control Commission assigned Bavaria the rights to Hitler's assets in 1946."

"Of course you can buy a copy at your local Barnes & Noble."

Who wants to sue Barnes & Noble for infringement?
Otherindependentm...
Date: May 26, 2004 @ 7:54 AM
Yeah, If I were him, I would claim the rights to it and release it to the public domain or at least put it out under the least restrictive creative common's license. (virtually the same thing!)

Shmoo
DMemberTheRealJFM
Date: May 26, 2004 @ 1:29 PM
personally i'd say distribution of something like this would serve as a lesson to ppl that "politics" is serious!
You must be logged in to post replies to news articles.
Log in or register with the form at the top of the page.

 

 

 

search

news tree


advertising



 

 
© DMusic LLC - Advertising | Employment | TOS | Subscribe