compmore
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 12:44 PM
overpriced coffee with overpriced music with limited playback options.
aparently that's what they think the masses wants
|
CodeWarrior
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 12:47 PM
I've been to Starbucks once..had one of their "flavored coffees" (and I am a coffee-holic...always buck flavored grounds)...never went back....horrible stuff....
This "partnering" crap always disgusts me...
"partnering"....Yuck!
|
In-Flames
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 1:06 PM
actually this could do some good, because it's exposing more people to the suckiness that is DRM.
|
In-Flames
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 1:07 PM
* more people will realize how much DRM sucks, and will join the boycott (or at least won't buy music online ever again) 
|
scayf
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 1:28 PM
Starbucks = cat-piss
DRM = bullshit
|
Suikiogiaz
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 1:44 PM
I'm a carbonated beverage person myself. Never went to Starbucks, and I probably never will.
|
purfus
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 1:48 PM
"When Apple CEO Steve Jobs launched the company's iTunes Music Store, he compared each song's 99c price tag with the cost of a latte. The coffee analogy has proved oddly prescient, since Apple may soon be serving up song downloads to Starbucks customers."
Okay.... Lets just add up apples and oranges and see what we get. Confounding variables??? Oh wait you cant add numbers from two seperate base number systems with a different base without converting the base of one.
I would say that a consumable is very different from a sensory input...
|
TheSherminator
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 2:11 PM
I went to a Starbucks in Hawai'i once and bought a brownie. That's the last time I give them 3 dollars.
Come to St. Louis everyone, I think the only Starbucks I've seen is in the airport (to make all the Starbucks loyalists feel at home when they get here).
|
gdZiemann
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 2:13 PM
purfus is going intellectual on us.
|
TheSherminator
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 2:13 PM
You can't put DRM in coffee can you? Watch out...
|
TheSherminator
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 2:14 PM
I wouldn't be able to reproduce
=)
|
death123
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 2:21 PM
Starbucks, overpriced crap
I-Tunes/DRM, overpriced crap
|
nessn12
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 2:31 PM
are they gonna have this at the Starbucks across the street from the Starbucks in houston
|
carla60626
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 3:06 PM
Aside from the stupidity of offering DRM music, this is an interesting attempt by the market to create new interest and demand in a digital product (which is what we've been saying all along -- find ways to deal with reality and make money). If the experiment fails of its own accord because the product is crappy, so be it. But the government should not abet these operations by mandating that all product have DRM.
No coffee or tea for me. Just give me good old Chicago tap water.
|
fjones987
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 3:32 PM
They're also changing names of their stores to be more suitable:
iStarTunesAppleJacksBucks$$$4MeNotYou-icrosoft
|
raoulduke1
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 3:54 PM
Support mom and pop coffee houses that offer free wifi.
|
eaglesniper
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 5:30 PM
Jim Rome said it best on his show a few years back when he described the owner of Starbucks as a "legalized drug dealer."
Now, they're going to offer DRM-infested music. Great. Just what we need. More crap that'll do us more harm to our health than good.
|
aphoxema
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 6:26 PM
As someone who's worked in "the coffee business" for more than three years, I can safely commit my opinion to the public that Starbucks makes (not necessarily has) the worst coffee you can buy.
As someone who has listened to the results of "the music business" for thier whole life, I can safely speculate that, more often than not, only really popular music is going to be on those lists. I can also be 100% sure that they'll all be RIAA protected or 'approved".
As someone who's been a musician for more than 4 years, I can safely swear that I would never sign a deal with the RIAA of any kind.
|
mtekk
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 9:04 PM
Starbuks sux, real people go to keraboo coffee (i'm not a coffee fan though)
|
crawdd
|
Date: March 11, 2004 @ 9:13 PM
If you can burn it to CD, there IS no drm. End of story.
|
PhantomGhost
|
Date: March 12, 2004 @ 1:29 AM
Oh, lovely.
Starbucks has EIGHT- yes, EIGHT- stores in Redmond, some of them just a block or two away from each other. You can't drive ten blocks without hitting a Starbucks in our town. And they're talking about building a second one- a NINTH Starbucks, a drive thru, not far away from two other Starbucks. Are they nuts, or is Redmond's coffee market simply gigantic? I couldn't tell you. I can tell you, though, I prefer Tully's (not all of you have Tully's in your area. We do. They're Starbucks' main competitor. They only have 2 redmond cafes, though).
:-:~ Phantom
|
TheSherminator
|
Date: March 12, 2004 @ 2:00 AM
If there's one thing this country needs 8 of within the span of a few blocks... why do people think it is coffee? Why can't we have 8 schools within a square mile? lol..
|
JohnCarlton02
|
Date: March 12, 2004 @ 6:52 AM
I'm sure carla60626 will back me up on this: in downtown Chicago, there is a Starbucks practically on EVERY block. And where there's not a Starbucks, a Caribou Coffee is there.
How much latte, double steamed crappuccinos & DRM infected music files does 1 city need? 
|
goldenpi
|
Date: March 12, 2004 @ 9:45 AM
McDonalds made the same mistake years ago. Expanded to the point their main competitor was themselves. Then they got into a price war, and ended up hiring a consultant who closed a lot of brances down.
|
scayf
|
Date: March 12, 2004 @ 10:24 AM
Where was I...Randall's, I think, in Friendswood, had a Satbuck's inside. Inside a stinkin' grocery store.
I get whole bean from Central Market and grind my own...Starbuck's can KMA.
|