http://www.go2net.com/headlines/ap/financial/D813DTO80.html
03/04/2004 02:46:41 EST
Judge Rejects Motion by Kazaa Owners
By MIKE CORDER
Associated Press Writer
A Federal Court judge Thursday rejected an application by Kazaa's owners that would have excluded evidence seized in a series of court-sanctioned raids last month from use in legal proceedings aimed at shutting down the file-swapping giant.
"Today is a total victory for the copyright owners," declared Michael Speck, a former police detective who is now general manager of Music Industry Piracy Investigations, a group major Australian record labels established to target copyright infringers. "It should send a clear message to Kazaa that it's time to get on with the case."
Lawyers for Kazaa's Sydney-based owner Sharman Networks, said they wanted to study the 23-page ruling before commenting. An appeal is possible.
Judge Murray Wilcox also rejected an application to suspend the Australian litigation until there is a verdict in a similar case currently before a U.S. court.
The Australian case is due back in court March 23.
Although Wilcox rejected Sharman's application, he also did not allow the music industry unfettered access to the evidence - including computer files and other data - gathered in the raids at Sharman and other companies with links to Kazaa. The home of Kazaa chief executive Nikki Hemming also was raided.
Instead, Wilcox suggested Sharman and the record industry investigators meet to discuss access to the evidence. If they fail to agree on how that should happen, Wilcox said he would make a further ruling.
The raids are a rarely used power that can be granted to litigants in Australian civil cases.
Kazaa software allows users to swap music, movies and other computer files.
Last month, Kazaa lawyer Rod Dorman called the copyright infringement suit a "desperate act of an industry that is losing the litigation war."
Kazaa already has one major court victory under its belt.
In December, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that Kazaa's Netherlands division cannot be held liable for copyright infringement of music or movies swapped using its free software.
Also, a three-judge panel in Pasadena, Calif., is currently hearing an appeal from entertainment companies that want to overturn a landmark ruling last April that cleared two companies of liability for users who swap files using their software.
Sharman was not part of that ruling, but the outcome of the appeal is expected to affect the entertainment companies' separate U.S. case against Sharman.